coding5 min read

You Might Not Need WebSockets: The Power of Server-Sent Events

Explore the simplicity and efficiency of Server-Sent Events (SSE) as an alternative to WebSockets for real-time web applications.

Kevin Liu profile picture

Kevin Liu

October 26, 2025

You Might Not Need WebSockets: The Power of Server-Sent Events

Why Server-Sent Events Are a Game-Changer

In the world of real-time web communication, WebSocket often steals the spotlight. It's powerful and supports bidirectional communication, making it the go-to solution for real-time applications. But is it always necessary? Imagine needing a simple tool for unidirectional data flow, like notifications or live updates. In these cases, WebSocket might be overkill. That's where Server-Sent Events (SSE) shine as a simpler, more efficient alternative.

The Drawbacks of Traditional Real-Time Data Updates

Why Polling Isn't Ideal

Polling is straightforward: the client periodically sends requests to the server for new data. However, this method has significant downsides:

  • High Latency: Users may wait unnecessarily long for updates.
  • Wasted Resources: Many requests return no new data, wasting bandwidth and server resources.
  • Poor Scalability: A high number of clients polling simultaneously can overwhelm the server.

The Mixed Blessing of WebSockets

WebSockets address these issues by maintaining a persistent, bidirectional connection. This setup is perfect for applications requiring instant data exchange in both directions. Yet, for tasks only needing server-to-client communication, WebSockets introduce unnecessary complexity. Managing connections, handling reconnections, and integrating with existing HTTP-based systems can complicate development.

The Advantages of Server-Sent Events

SSE is a part of the HTTP standard designed for unidirectional data flow from server to client. It's a perfect fit for sending updates or notifications without the overhead of a full WebSocket connection.

Why Opt for SSE?

  • Simplicity: SSE works over HTTP, simplifying integration with web applications.
  • Efficiency: It uses a single HTTP connection, reducing the need for multiple request-response cycles.
  • Ease of Use: Implementing SSE is straightforward, with clear protocols for sending data and managing connections.

Implementing SSE on the Client Side

Using SSE is as simple as initiating an EventSource and listening for messages:

const eventSource = new EventSource('http://127.0.0.1:60000/sse');

eventSource.onopen = function () {
  console.log('Connection established. Ready for updates.');
};

eventSource.onmessage = function (event) {
  console.log('New update:', event.data);
};

eventSource.onerror = function (event) {
  if (event.target.readyState === EventSource.CLOSED) {
    console.log('Connection closed.');
  } else {
    console.error('Error:', event);
  }
};

This setup benefits from built-in automatic reconnection, minimizing the need for manual error handling.

When Should You Still Use WebSockets?

While SSE excels at simple unidirectional tasks, WebSockets remain unmatched for complex, high-frequency, bidirectional communication needs. It's crucial to assess your application's requirements and choose the most suitable technology.

Conclusion: Choosing the Right Tool for the Job

The essence of good software engineering is selecting the right tool for each task. SSE offers a streamlined, efficient option for unidirectional communication, often making it a better choice than WebSockets for specific use cases. By understanding and leveraging SSE, developers can create simpler, more reliable applications that better meet their needs.

Related Articles