technology3 min read

Bcachefs Removed from the Mainline Kernel: What It Means

The recent removal of Bcachefs from the Linux kernel raises questions about filesystem stability and innovation. What does this mean for developers and users?

Alex Chen profile picture

Alex Chen

September 30, 2025

Bcachefs Removed from the Mainline Kernel: What It Means

Why Was Bcachefs Removed from the Linux Kernel?

The Linux community recently witnessed the removal of Bcachefs from the mainline kernel, sparking discussions among developers and tech enthusiasts. Bcachefs, once hailed as a cutting-edge filesystem, aimed to boost data storage performance and efficiency. Its removal, however, prompts a closer look at the implications for filesystem innovation and what lies ahead for developers and users.

What Exactly Is Bcachefs?

Bcachefs emerged as a forward-thinking filesystem, designed to leverage the speed and reliability of solid-state drives (SSDs). It integrated features from established filesystems like Btrfs and ZFS, offering:

  • Multi-device support: Simplifies managing data across several drives.
  • Snapshots and cloning: Allows creating data copies at specific points in time.
  • Compression and deduplication: Helps in reducing the storage space needed.
  • Caching mechanisms: Improves the speeds of reading and writing data.

Despite its groundbreaking features, Bcachefs encountered hurdles that led to its exclusion from the Linux kernel.

What Led to the Removal of Bcachefs?

Several key issues contributed to the decision to remove Bcachefs:

  1. Stability Concerns: The filesystem's stability was questionable during thorough testing, a critical issue for enterprise use.
  2. Performance Issues: Bcachefs failed to consistently outperform established filesystems like ext4 and XFS under various conditions.
  3. Complexity in Code Maintenance: The intricate nature of Bcachefs posed challenges for kernel maintainers in terms of support and management.
  4. Limited Adoption: Its novelty meant Bcachefs had not yet achieved broad acceptance, hampering its development and refinement.

What's the Impact on Developers and Users?

The exclusion of Bcachefs has direct consequences:

  • Shift in Focus: Developers might pivot to more stable and supported filesystems, with Btrfs and ZFS possibly receiving more attention.
  • Future of Filesystem Innovation: This move raises questions about the space for new filesystems within the Linux ecosystem.
  • Impact on Performance: Users in search of high-performance filesystems may need to reassess their choices, prioritizing efficiency and reliability.

What Are Bcachefs Alternatives?

With Bcachefs no longer an option, several other filesystems stand out as strong alternatives:

  • Btrfs: Offers advanced features like snapshots and RAID support, backed by a robust community.
  • ZFS: Known for its data integrity and capacity to handle large volumes of data, making it a favorite in enterprise settings.
  • ext4: The go-to filesystem for many Linux distributions, providing reliable performance for a broad user base.

Conclusion

The removal of Bcachefs marks a significant moment in the evolution of filesystem technology. Despite its potential, the challenges it faced were significant. Moving forward, the focus should be on filesystems that offer stability and support, such as Btrfs, ZFS, and ext4. The future of filesystem development remains dynamic, with the potential for new innovations that emphasize reliability and performance. Keep an eye on this space for future developments that will undoubtedly influence the direction of data storage technology.

Related Articles